• Welcome to the FUTURE!

    The PublicFutures BLOG keeps you current on the latest research and thinking on major trends, policy shifts, 'hot topics', and evolving perspectives about the Future. Be sure to subscribe to the RSS or get email updates so you are kept up-to-date on all the latest posts.
  • Email Updates

  • Share the FUTURE with the world!

  • Learn more at our Company Site

An Ignorant and Slippery Slope

Almost two years ago, Robert Samuelson wrote an essay in Newsweek (Let Them go Bankrupt, Soon, June 1, 2009) suggesting that citizens and politicians would never take Medicare and Social Security issues seriously until the systems failed. Citing extended life and more robust health among the U.S. population, he noted that more seniors (i.e. Boomers) will swamp both systems before mid-century.

While this is not the newest of news, it is interesting to me that Samuelson’s very powerful and carefully documented commentary and many since that time have failed to spark much effort to counter the slide to oblivion. Over the next 75 years, Social Security and Medicare will cost around $103 trillion while revenues will generate approximately $57 trillion. With a gap of almost $46 trillion, one would reasonably calculate this country would be in a precarious fiscal dilemma known to most of us Pilgrims as bankruptcy.

To be sure, our society places a premium on caring for the old, disadvantaged and infirm, but what of all the other obligations? One would think public infrastructure (ports, airports, highways, and bridges), defense, public health, public transportation, housing and education are worth retaining. If Medicare and Social Security trust funds won’t be exhausted until 2017 and 2037 respectively, it would seem we have time for a course correction. Why has there been no action?  Review the facts – every administration and congress merely pushes the crises further into the future, as the current crop of diddlers do little more that nibble around the edges and posture for political gain.

Tax reform is inevitable. As it would be in any private enterprise, growing debt indicates living beyond the means required to support the business. At some point, it is time to 1) cut spending, and 2) do what is possible to grow revenue. Pretty simple.  U.S. tax rates are generally low for the middle class and ridiculously low for high earners. Corporations, on the other hand, could use a tax break, which in turn might bring some of the multinationals (and their tax revenues) back home. Even slightly raising taxes for a period of time would help right the ship, as long as those additional revenues were used in concert with spending reductions.

Even larger looming issues are actually a convergence of several enormous negative variables. Deteriorating infrastructure, declining educational performance, cost of education, incessant and meaningless warfare and a financial system that preys on a nation hooked on credit are all impacting the American culture. And, the slope is beginning to incline to the point that catastrophic impacts are bound to occur…not in decades, but within a few short years.

The climate is shifting, the housing bubble remains problematic for millions of homeowners, oil prices are escalating, and deferred maintenance has become a way of life. We are living on borrowed time and still cannot bring ourselves to quit posturing, reduce spending, focus on the essential, and take sensible corrective action. Keep in mind that, as we debate and dink around, the most serious variables are bearing down on this country. There will be a multi-trillion price to pay for deferred maintenance; there is still not enough oil to support global needs and fuel costs will continue to rise; the climate will continue to evolve, with potentially disastrous effects (monsoons, epic snow or tornados, anyone?); and existing entitlements will continue to push the country toward bankruptcy.

In the meantime, much of the developing world is intent in building a ‘free market democracy,’ meaning that everyone has an opportunity to do business. Whether the world is truly flat is questionable, but one thing is certain – many countries are quite interested in trade, progress, growth, and development.  Kiplinger’s global forecasts put GDP for Brazil, South Korea, Russia, and Mexico at between 4% and 5% for both 2011 and 2012. GDP for China and India will both exceed 9% for the next two years. The U.S. will max out at around 3% and the Euro zone probably won’t break 2%. Commerce drives revenue. However, it can neither energize good decision-making, nor provide the will to make difficult choices.

As stated many times in this Blog, everything must now be triaged. What is in the best common interest of every community and state must drive every decision…not political affiliation or ideology. Very few professionals I contact in Washington D.C. are optimistic about the future. This is due mostly to the lack of foresight and will being reflected in partisan deliberations and empty rhetoric. 2011 is nearly half over, and we are no closer to being prepared for the enormous challenges ahead.

With over three decades working in and with federal, state and local government, John Luthy understands public agencies.  Known for his real world, straight talking style, he is a leading futurist specializing in city, county, state, and federal long-range thinking and planning. John is the author of Operations Planning: A Guide for Public Officials and Managers in Troubled Times, and The Strategic Planning Guide, both published by the International City/ County Management Association (ICMA). His new book, Planning the Future – A Guide to Strategic Thinking and Planning for Elected Officials, Public Administrators and Community Leaders, was released in October 2010. An innovative and dynamic presenter, John is frequently asked to speak and consult on how to prepare public organizations and communities for emerging challenges (public futures at http://www.futurescorp.com).

Advertisements

One Response

  1. I sort of agree with your viewpoint. However, when we are talking about “Over the next 75 years, Social Security and Medicare will …” there has to be a disqualifier, it seems to me that technological progress — that creates enormous riches — must be considered.
    I would say that in 75 years “Medicare” could just be embedded nano-machines that take care of your health second-by-second without too much cost. Just like a cellphone enables communications without the Publicphone-operators-telegram-deliveryboy that used to be the norm 75 years ago. And also, what if by 2086 life-expentancy goes up to 120 years, with good health? What will that do to pensions?
    In any estimate of future costs there are too many variables, and of them the fastest of changes comes from technology. Today politics are just a level above Roman style, technology has taken a huge leap.
    I enjoy your blogs, keep it coming!

    Dr. Humberto Contreras

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: