• Welcome to the FUTURE!

    The PublicFutures BLOG keeps you current on the latest research and thinking on major trends, policy shifts, 'hot topics', and evolving perspectives about the Future. Be sure to subscribe to the RSS or get email updates so you are kept up-to-date on all the latest posts.
  • Email Updates

  • Share the FUTURE with the world!

  • Learn more at our Company Site

Converging Ideology

As America rounds the turn and heads into the annual fall home stretch, there are many competing and converging ideologies serving as platforms for debate, idle discourse and debacle. As with any social evolution, the conceptual lattice that frames most fundamental arguments tends to erode or morph as curious and committed thinkers seek middle ground.

Over the next several months, we will see competing arguments for more austerity, quantitative easing, increased government investment, greater isolation, economic expansion, Syrian intervention and every conceivable tax reform. For the casual observer, it will be a period of ideological confusion fueled by elusive facts and ill-defined goals. For those inclined toward rigorous study and enlightened review, the last four months of 2012 will be one of the most frustrating, challenging and kinetic periods in recent history.

The austerity movement has lost its appeal as economists and business leaders re-learned the fact that chronic deficits have multiple causes. As government retrenched and cut spending, it reduced demand and lowered confidence. The inadvertent message has been stark: the future is unclear, proceed with caution, take no chances and wait and see. And, the big message seems to be that no one really has any idea what to do.  Rather than taking the lead, for the most part governments have created a darker global vision that is energized by political disharmony, nationalistic idealism, greed and fear. The message has certainly not been optimistic or visionary, and there is little evidence of wisdom, foresight or commitment to a sensible alternative future.

As noted in the August 2 Public Futures blog, the return to Keynesian discourse has been interesting, due to its advocacy for positive government intervention. Understanding that too much frugality promotes recessionary attitudes, Keynes advocated a balance between saving and spending; the more we save and reduce private and public spending, the slower the economy grows, so balance is critical. And, of course, a downward spiral ensues when governments, business and families assume an ‘every man for himself’ posture that inhibits balance among the essential elements of planning, sharing, investing, spending, and saving.

There is empirical evidence that the following do not work: 1) reducing budget deficits by cutting spending, especially spending for social services; 2) reducing taxes for the top earners; and 3) deregulating business so ‘wealth generators’ have more incentive to invest. All recent economic crises saw some variation of this theme beginning with the global debt crises in 1982, and continuing with the 1994 Mexican crisis, 1997 Asian crisis, the Brazilian and Russian crises in 1998 and the Argentine crisis in 2002. In every case, the IMF and other institutions forced these countries to cut spending and build budget surpluses. Historic data clearly shows that recessions in those economies grew much worse. Therefore, since 1980, tax cuts, permissive loopholes, and deregulation have not led to economic growth, and in many cases, economies actually grew weaker.

As with most of my commentaries, I encourage readers to seek factual historic data and not rely on current media, political or biased institutional reporting. The ultimate question is, ‘What are current leaders reading and thinking?’ At a time when the infrastructure is eroding, America’s educational system is proving less robust than those in other countries, drought is ravaging two-thirds of the nation, fires are destroying millions of acres, and senseless war continues to take the lives of young men and women, why is there no national consensus on what seem to be clear priorities?

America is positioned to assume the greatest global leadership role in its history. This will not be through military strength or humanitarian aid, but through its ability to demonstrate unity, clarity, direction, and will. Most citizens are hunkered down, trying to weather the storm and hoping for better days. Inertia has dampened the American spirit at a time when the population is growing, new markets are emerging, and U.S. enterprises are positioned to expand. Rather than seeing and seizing opportunity, far too many are waiting for someone else to take the lead.

It is time to re-think our politics; it is time to follow prudent, long-term economic policies; it is time to reconsider what America stands for; and, it is time for citizens to define the preferred future. Our future is not associated with a political party, nor is it associated with a single ideology. It will be founded on an understanding of what it means to lead, care for others, be accountable, and constantly progress. We celebrate the recent Olympic competition that is driven by pride, spirit, and enormous will, regardless of national stature, religion, culture, or ideologies represented by the athletes.  We must now find that same unique willingness to accept, collaborate, compete and celebrate if we are to build this nation and lead through several more difficult years.

America is being challenged. It is time to distill the best solutions from multiple ideologies and forge a clear path to the future. There is not one path forward, but many. Finding those converging paths will require our best thinking and best thinkers…in an atmosphere based on mutuality, common vision, commitment, and trust. When will we fully embrace that process?

With over three decades working in and with federal, state and local government, John Luthy understands public agencies.  Known for his real world, straight talking style, he is a leading futurist specializing in city, county, state, and federal government long-range thinking and planning. John is the author of Operations Planning: A Guide for Public Officials and Managers in Troubled Times, and The Strategic Planning Guide, both published by the International City/ County Management Association (ICMA). His 2010 book, Planning the Future – A Guide to Strategic Thinking and Planning for Elected Officials, Public Administrators and Community Leaders, is being hailed as the best book for public managers and community leaders who are committed to building a sustainable future.  An innovative and dynamic presenter, John is frequently asked to speak and consult on how to prepare public organizations and communities for emerging challenges (public futures at http://www.futurescorp.com).

One Response

  1. It is time to start giving credence to Basic Income. It is obvious that productivity is growing. Today the developed countries are experiencing overproduction. 50 million chinese are producing enough for all of us (US, Europe, the rich in other countries). You can buy any number of cars you want. And the car factories could produce 30% more on a moments notice. Goods are available, consumers are not. And to repeat the theme, soon there will be worldwide overproduction of goods.

    Technology is improving at an exponential rate. In 10-20 years all cars will drive themselves. In 20 years AI will be commonplace. In 20 years medicine will change dramatically. Nano, computing and bio will produce many changes. We have to start thinking about simultaneous changes in the economy and in our social interactions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: